War is a racket, as the title of USMC Major General Smedley Butler's historic antiwar treatise proclaimed decades ago. Similarly, a close look at U.S. Commerce Department efforts to steer contracts to U.S.-based firms to rebuild of Afghanistan's Kandahar Airport is but one indicator that the racket of war -- embodied in the so-called Global War on Terror (GWOT) -- continues in full force.
"It always has been [a racket]," Butler wrote. "It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives."
The Peacock Report this week discovered that Commerce's Bureau of Industry & Security (BIS), on behalf of the NATO Maintenance and Supply Agency (NAMSA), is playing gatekeeper for the latest stage of this reconstruction effort. According to a July 18 "presolicitation notice" that TPR obtained during a routine search of the FedBizOpps database, BIS is the primary arbiter of which construction and engineering firms get their foot in the door for a potential piece of the Kandahar pie, the estimated value of which "will not be disclosed at this time."
The rebuilding of Kandahar Airport, which was destroyed during battles between coalition forces and the Taliban in post-9/11 conflict, solely will involve firms that, at a minimum, maintain existing facilities in the U.S. Bids from non-U.S. companies headquartered in NATO member nations are permitted under Commerce's discretion, so long as those companies already have an established presence in the homeland -- the U.S. homeland, that is.
Except for firms already cleared and listed in what is known as the NAMSA Source File, "additional firms must be introduced by their National Delegations with the required Declaration of Eligibility (DOE)," the document says. Once approved, Commerce then forwards the eligibility declaration to the U.S. Embassy, "which in turn forwards it to the Host Nation."
The Host Nation, by the way, is not Afghanistan, in the context of this procurement. The Host Nation, in only a technical, contractual sense of the phrase, is NATO's NAMSA, which has surrendered oversight of this project segment to the U.S. Commerce Dept.
All NATO member nations individually designate one of their government agencies as a national representative in NATO, specific to pursuing contracting opportunities for their respective industry sectors. But as the U.S. provides 25% of the financial backing for the NATO Security Investment Program (NSIP) -- under which the Kandahar project will be carried out -- it is leveraging this position as a means for funneling that "investment" back to U.S. businesses.
Not only are Afghanistan firms hypothetically barred from getting involved in the rebuilding of Kandahar Airport, the infrastructure initiative isn't at all geared toward Afghanistan's economic recovery. The endeavor, which seeks to "design, build and commission aircraft operating facilities, maintenance facilities and other airfield related facilities," is for the express benefit of the U.S.-led International Security Assistance Force.
The U.S. Commerce Dept. no doubt would view its role in terms of fulfilling its executive-branch mission "to foster, serve, and promote the Nation’s economic development and technological advancement." Indeed, Commerce is clearly helping U.S. industry -- helping it to milk the GWOT racket, cloaked under the guise of patriotism and free trade.
"A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people," Maj. Gen. Butler wrote. "Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes."
Ironically, the Commerce Dept. posted its presolicitation notice for the Afghanistan project the same day that the General Accountability Office (GAO) -- the nonpartisan investigative and auditing arm of Congress -- warned in a report that "neither DOD nor the Congress reliably know how much" the [GWOT] is costing U.S. taxpayers.
Equally uncertain is the extent that these unknown costs may threaten the future financial stability of the U.S., or its ability to take care of veterans maimed or injured during GWOT activities, according to GAO.
The July 18 GAO report, Global War on Terrorism: Observations on Funding, Costs, and Future Commitment, asserts that the federal government is unable to provide evidence of how it's using congressionally appropriated GWOT money, nor is the Pentagon able or willing to provide "historical data useful in considering future funding needs." Consequently, "future cost variables" for GWOT activities, including efforts by U.S. government agencies to help form governments, to build "capable and loyal security forces in Afghanistan and Iraq, and meet the healthcare needs of veterans, including providing future disability payments and medical services," are potentially jeopardized.
Enemies At Home
"This is America, and we are being treated like enemies for wanting to keep our home," Clara Halper was quoted telling the Asbury Park Press in a July 22 article. "Where is the justice? The township is just a bunch of cowards."
The Peacock Report agrees, and is urging all citizens to contact Mayor Wahler and express their disgust with this horrendous abuse of governmental authority. Wahler can be reached by phone at 732-699-9225, and in the alternative can be contacted via the U.S. Postal Service via a letter to 455 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ 08854. Speak your mind, but please be civil.
Posted at 12:00 AM in Commentary, Corruption and Waste | Permalink
| Reblog (0)