The nation must place “sustained focus” on improving teacher quality in order to create a genuinely “democratic and economically stable society,” the Obama Administration has concluded. Consequently, the White House has decided to invest nearly $100 million into a new program to enhance primary school teaching-training and management nationwide—nationwide, that is, in Iraq.
Obama, through the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), even has given the initiative an Arabic title: Ajyal, which means “generations.”
In order to improve the Government of Iraq’s ability to deliver “quality primary education,” USAID is launching the Education Strengthening Project, also known as USAID/Ajyal, according to a planning document that WND obtained through routine database research.
“Children in Iraq need quality instruction,” the agency said in a Request for Proposals dated April 12, and the U.S. is determined to bring about “systems improvements to deliver quality instruction and safe learning environments.”
Although the Iraqi Ministry of Education has 20 Teacher Training Institutes, or TTIs, throughout the nation, the facilities “lack standardized training for early primary grade teachers, who have little opportunity to receive professional development… As a result, there is no continuity or consistency in the training that teachers receive on an annual basis.”
The agency acknowledged in the document that a variety of organization already embarked upon similar endeavors.
“Other donors such as UNESCO, the World Bank, UNICEF and Save the Children have programs targeting teacher training, curriculum reform and access to education at the community level,” it said.
Nonetheless, the agency does not view this latest effort as redundant; rather, the existing programs will “complement” what USAID/Ajyal is setting out to achieve.
USAID is looking for a contractor to carry out this program by engaging the TTIs, the central offices of the Iraq Ministry of Education, provincial-level Ministry offices, and a few select primary schools.
“Special attention will be given to expanding educational opportunities for girls, and other vulnerable populations and minorities so that they might enjoy higher engagement and retention,” the Statement of Work pointed out. “These students will be aided in their transition to intermediate schools.”
FOR FURTHER REPORTING ON THE U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PLEASE VISIT THE MONITOR'S USAID PAGE.
FOR ADDITIONAL REGIONAL COVERAGE, SEE THE MONITOR'S IRAQ PAGE.
Hurricane Sandy: Another Example of Why We Need to Invest More in America, Less Around the Globe (COMMENTARY)
I have an idea how we as a nation can better cope with the financial burden that nature has imposed upon us in this post-hurricane environment of devastation on the East Coast: Assess and then cancel various programs that U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the U.S. Trade & Development Agency currently are carrying out or are planning to implement across the globe.
For the sake of full disclosure, I say this not only as a concerned taxpayer who continues to advocate streamlining (not the elimination) of foreign aid, but as a human being who lives one mile from the beach on the battered New Jersey coast -- someone who is doing significantly better than many of his Shore neighbors, but who is temporarily displaced nonetheless.
Before I continue, also keep in mind that this is less political -- insofar as partisan politics -- than it appears. Yes, the Obama Administration currently is executing the following initiatives. But as I've said before, it's a power thing, not an Obama thing. Such endeavors took place under Clinton and Bush, and in various forms will continue under future presidents.
Here we go:
Cancel the planned development of Ph.D. and masters degree programs for which USAID intends to fund in a Ugandan university. Use that money in schools across New Jersey, New York, or Connecticut.
Cancel the nearly $1 billion in construction projects that USAID has planned for the Palestinians. Use it to rebuild homes, businesses, and infrastucture destroyed during the hurricane. OUR hurricane.
Those business start-up projects in The Philippines? Cancel them. Most of the businesses in my area are closed, hopefully just temporarily. many, presumbaly, will go under. Tell the Filipinos they have to wait.
The groundwater cleanup projects in for which USTDA paid the cost of U.S. industry reps to fly to China to boost that sector? Stop such subsidies, damnit. I'm guessing the groundwater between Seaside Heights and Point Pleasant (among other locations) could use some ameliorating.
The list is seemningly endless. There are bigger and even more controversial projects, I am sure, the billions is no so-called "drug war" contracts among one of the more insane categories.
Oh, okay, just one more example (out of many). I know it amounts to peanuts, but the $322,000 that Department of State just spent on a 10-animal dog kennel in Iraq could have been used to rebuild damaged animal -- and human -- shelters here on the East Coast instead. Just sayin.' -- Steve Peacock
Posted at 01:25 PM in Africa, China, Commentary, Gaza/West Bank, Iraq, U.S. State Dept., USAID, USTDA, White House | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: business, government, hurricane, hurricane sandy, politics
| Reblog (0)