Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/obama-blurs-line-between-military-foreign-aid/#vQZ8uAUuw9xYda1I.99
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/obama-blurs-line-between-military-foreign-aid/#vQZ8uAUuw9xYda1I.9The lines between U.S. military and humanitarian actions have become increasingly blurred under the Obama administration, which globally will deploy advisers to further merge what historically were separate defense and foreign-aid functions.
Seeking adviser to 'deploy with DOD forces in humanitarian emergencies'
The lines between U.S. military and humanitarian actions have become increasingly blurred under the Obama administration, which globally will deploy advisers to further merge what historically were separate defense and foreign-aid functions.
The reformation began under President George W. Bush but is reaching new heights under Obama.
The Military Liaison Team, or MLT, at the U.S. Agency for International Development will leverage the new advisers to coordinate efforts between USAID and all Department of Defense agencies, according to planning documents that U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor discovered via routine database research.
These Humanitarian Assistance Adviser/Military, or HAA/M, adviser posts will serve as a “critical liaison function between USAID and the DoD military establishment.” USAID on Sept. 27 began publicly recruiting candidates to fill multiple HAA/M slots both domestically and worldwide.
The goal of the liaison function will be to “represent the humanitarian sector perspective and expertise” in situations in which parties such as USAID and DOD – as well as the United Nations, NGOs and “private voluntary organizations” – jointly respond to international crises.
HAA/M candidates must have “professional experience planning for or responding to” chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear or explosive events, the Personal Services Contracting notice emphasizes.
The agency’s Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance, or OFDA, initially will deploy the HAA/Ms to DOD Combatant Command facilities where there already exists “an OFDA operational need to work with the military independent of future country specific disasters.”
Those locations include Stuttgart, Germany – current home of the U.S. Africa Command – as well as Honolulu and Miami.
OFDA’s strategic plan also is weighing potential HAA/M assignments in Washington, D.C.; Bangkok, Thailand; San Jose, Costa Rica; Okinawa, Japan; and Manama, Bahrain, the document says.
OFDA is the primary USAID unit tasked with providing “emergency non-food humanitarian assistance.”
The three-division office is part of the Bureau for Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance, or DCHA.
OFDA separately is recruiting for a HAA/M position that the office has planned for U.S. Special Operations Command, or USSOCOM, headquarters at MacDill Air Force Base, Tampa, Fla.
“Due to their existing presence in countries around the world, special operations forces (SOF) can be the first U.S. military forces in country following natural disasters or complex emergencies,” the solicitation says.
Because of SOF’s unique global responsibilities, “OFDA is increasingly liaising and engaging with those units to ensure staff awareness of [U.S. government] roles before, during, and following an international disaster response operation.”
Indeed, the Bush administration centered its efforts at USSOCOM when the White House first sought to create some parallel USAID and DOD functions.
That initiative countered the traditional U.S. government perspective on USAID’s distinct humanitarian role.
The John F. Kennedy administration created USAID as a unit intentionally detached from “political and military functions that plagued its predecessor organizations,” according to the agency’s official history. As a consequence of this separation, USAID more ably could offer “direct support to the developing nations of the world.”
Under Bush, however, USAID’s DCMA unit in 2005 created the Office of Military Affairs, subsequently hiring senior advisers to initiate and expand its relationship with DOD.
USAID started this process by hiring senior development advisers to USSOCOM and to the U.S. European Command, respectively.
Soon after, it sought to install a Washington, D.C.-based senior military adviser to “create, foster and formalize a network of working relationships between USAID and the U.S. military, with a focus on leaders throughout the Pentagon.”
The creation of the more recent HAA/M adviser positions will attempt to elevate these relationships to a higher level, while also taking steps to ensure that the lines are not completed blurred when it comes to military and humanitarian functions.
Among the core duties of the advisers will be to “deploy with DOD forces in humanitarian emergencies” and to “assist OFDA management in defining a strategy for military coordination.”
Despite the coordination, the adviser also will be tasked with drawing at least some distinction between DOD and USAID responsibilities.
The establishment of these boundaries is evidenced by additional duties called for in the solicitation. Among them is the stated need to “coordinate with the humanitarian community to achieve the best use of military assets by reducing redundant or counterproductive military activities.”
The HAA/M adviser likewise must determine “whether OFDA participation in DoD humanitarian activities is necessary and useful.”
This article originally was published via WND on Oct. 1, 2013. Under agreement with the publisher, rights have reverted back to the author, Steve Peacock.
U.S. Prepares for Casualties in Africa
The extrication of U.S. Special Forces injured in African military ventures soon will provide contractors with an additional revenue stream, now that the Obama administration plans to keep such vendors on stand-by, 24/7, for cross-continent airborne mobilization.
While the Pentagon’s reliance on private vendors to support international military operations is nothing new, plans to station such providers specific to such a large swath of Africa does deviate from prior procurement actions.
The Trans-Sahara Short Take-Off and Landing Airlift Support initiative will rely on outside assistance in the event that soldiers of U.S. Special Operations Command-Africa sustain traumatic medical emergencies, thereby requiring urgent transportation out of hostile zones.
Indeed, SOCOM-Africa places such urgency on its anticipated use of such Casualty Evacuation, or CASEVAC, services that, at a minimum, contractors must be capable of launching an airborne response with only a three hour notice.
The selected vendor likewise must possess the ability to be placed on heightened response and “be airborne within one hour of notification,” according a revised Performance Work Statement released April 16 that U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor located via routine database research.
Despite this urgency, the vendor securing that contract largely will engage in cargo- and personnel airlift activities, plus a limited number of air-drop missions.
The “most likely” locations for such operations are Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Tunisia, according to the U.S. Transportation Command solicitation.
Kenya, Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Sudan, South Sudan, and Uganda also fall within the Primary Operating Area, or POA, of this endeavor, the USTRANSCOM document says.
SOCOM-Africa will enable this expedited response-capability by stationing the contractor in Burkina Faso, a landlocked West African nation, it says.
A search of prior Tactical Combat Casualty Care and CASEVAC solicitations available via the FedBizOpps system shows that USSOCOM and other Department of Defense units typically and primarily seek only training and equipment.
Rather than soliciting continent-wide provision of emergency medical and flight assistance, those contracting actions generally have sought assistance to enable combatant commands to provide themselves with such medical assistance.
One USSOCOM contracting action representative of the government’s acquisition of CASEVAC “kits” and trauma-management training, for example, described a critical need for Special Operations combat forces to obtain new techniques and technology in support of “ongoing operations worldwide.”
Another Special Ops solicitation from late last year revealed a $40 million, two-year contract extension awarded to Tribalco, LLC, a Bethesda, Maryland-based maker of CASEVAC and other “soldier-survival” equipment.
USTRANSCOM did not disclose an estimated cost of the Africa-centric CASEVAC procurement.
In other U.S. military procurement actions specific to Africa:
This article originally appeared via WND April 28. Under prior agreement, rights have reverted back to the author, Steve Peacock.
Posted at 06:49 PM in Africa, Algeria, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Commentary, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Libya, Mauritania, Military, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, North Africa, Senegal, South Sudan, Sudan, Tunisia, U.S. Navy, U.S. Special Forces, White House, WND | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: africa, business, government, obama, politics
| Reblog (0)