The Obama administration is
launching new peace initiatives in and around Kenya, but acknowledges that
chronic cattle rustling and other cultural practices – such as killing rivals
“to prove their manhood or impress young women” – serve as impediments to progress.
Obama, through the U.S. Agency for
International Development, nonetheless intends to hire private contractors that
would, hypothetically, offer services such as “reflective workshops” and
“trauma education” to warring clans and tribes, according to an agency concept paper that U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor located
through routine database research.
The purpose of such providing
services is to encourage empathy between “victims” and “perpetrators” – terms
that the document repeatedly encloses in quotation marks to emphasize USAID’s
position that so-called “perpetrators” also have endured trauma.
Exchanging “trauma stories” between
hostile groups is a critical step in the community healing process, USAID says,
as this sharing helps to raise awareness that “victims” are often the
“perpetrators,” particularly when they carry out acts of revenge. This approach
is one of several that USAID is proposing.
The “PEACE III” concept paper offers
detailed ideas aimed at promoting stability across East African border regions.
USAID recently released the paper to solicit feedback from contractors on
various “theories of change” that could be implemented as part of future Horn of
Africa peace and reconciliation programs.
The Obama administration hopes to
create “healing peace-building cycles” that ultimately will replace “cycles of
violence,” particularly along multiple conflict-prone points on the
Kenya-Uganda, Kenya-South Sudan, Kenya-Ethiopia, Kenya-Somalia, and
Ethiopia-South Sudan borders.
USAID said in the document that
attaining such stability “is a central U.S. foreign policy and development
priority in the context of regional security and economic integration.”
The agency acknowledges that the
task ahead will be difficult, as “certain cultural practices and norms” in the
Horn of Africa “may encourage acts of violence.”
“For example, in the western border
areas, spiritual leaders bless the warriors before and after cattle raids,” the
concept paper says. “A warrior is believed to have defended the pride of his
clan and proven his manhood when he murders a man from the enemy tribe/clan.
“Songs and dances prepared for such
warriors stir other warriors and young men to engage in murder and cattle
raids. Women rebuke the warriors who have not been successful in raids rousing
them to raid again,” the paper points out.
Despite the cultural, political, and
economic challenges to successfully implementing conflict management programs,
USAID says it had identified a “multitude of determined, credible, and
committed actors at the regional, national, and local levels” that in the long
term could help bring more “stability, peace, and prosperity to this part of
the world.”
“The region is also witnessing a
shift in national government commitment to peaceful management of conflicts,”
the agency added.
Community peace-building efforts
have led to some security improvements, especially in areas such as the
Kenya-Somalia border, USAID says. Community leaders – including women,
religious, business, youth, and elders – have helped mediate disputes before
they escalate, thereby changing cultural practices that often lead to
inter-communal violence.
Weaker governments, however,
sometimes view these informal systems as rivals. Rather than supporting those
systems, such governments attempt to undermine or simply ignore them,
dismissing such organizations and activities as irrelevant.
“In several locations, most notably
Kenya, the government has even sought to institutionalize this governance
partnership nationally, via local peace and development committees,” the
document says. The PEACE III initiative consequently will “focus on catalyzing
the emergence and development of local peace-building networks in volatile
border areas.”
Despite proposed cuts in U.S.
foreign assistance to most nations – including Kenya – the Obama administration
nonetheless has sought to sustain other contractors that already carry out
voluminous projects in that nation.
As the Monitor also has reported,
USAID under Obama likewise launched a propaganda program aimed at swaying national and international opinion to
support Kenya-related U.S. programs.
Following that Monitor report –
which exposed federal plans to target specific journalists – the Obama
administration sanitized its FedBizOpps contracting database of all traces of
that and other Kenya-centric procurement documents.
The Monitor, however, restored public access to the USAID/Kenya Strategic Communications Plan 2012-2013.
In a separate, recent solicitation, USAID is recruiting a Program Officer-Kenya for
its Office of Transition Initiatives, where the private contractor would serve
for the remainder of OTI’s scheduled stay in Kenya. The position in mid-2013
will transition to USAID-Kenya’s Education & Youth Office.
OTI had established a Nairobi-based
presence as part of Obama’s “support of the February 28, 2008, peace accord
between competing political parties in the wake of inter-ethnic violence
following flawed national elections in December 2007,” the personal services
contractor solicitation says.
One of the key responsibilities of
the Program Officer-Kenya will be to “represent program interests with USAID
Mission personnel, U.S. Embassy staff, Department of State, and Department of
Defense personnel.” In addition to needing a top secret-level security
clearance, potential candidates who are dual citizens “may be asked to renounce
second-country citizenship.”
The position, which pays in the
$84,697-$110,104 range, also involves providing guidance to and oversight of
contractors carrying out the Support Which Implements Fast Transition, or SWIFT
III, initiative.
SWIFT III is a $1.5 billion worldwide USAID program whose goal
is to “support U.S. foreign policy objectives by helping local partners advance
peace and democracy in priority countries in crisis.”
USAID additionally has launched an information-gathering initiative to identify
local and regional consultants and organizations to provide future short- and
long-term “technical services and capacity building assistance.” This would
include services specific to agency cross-border peace projects to the
USAID/East Africa mission in Nairobi.
The agency’s search for potential
help via this Request for Information is not limited to Kenya, however; indeed,
the RFI likewise seeks to compile a comprehensive list of consultants to
potentially work with other USAID regional offices and partners in Somalia,
Djibouti, South Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, Central African Republic and Tanzania.
A similar version of this article appeared via WND.com on March 9. Under agreement with WND, rights have reverted back to its author, Steve Peacock.
Former Federal Prosecutor Leverages Steve Peacock's U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor in Column
Many thanks to Andrew C. McCarthy of National Review Online for using U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor today as a supplemental resource in his article "Shhh, Don't Tell Anyone Hamas Won."
McCarthy, author of Spring Fever: The Illusion of Islamic Democracy, via the NRO piece linked to "Obama to Exclude U.S. Companies from $300 Million Palestinian Project" (Monitor, Aug. 17, 2012).
McCarthy, it should be noted, is not your average columnist. Indeed, check out his bio:
I am honored that Mr. McCarthy has recognized the value of U.S. Trade & Aid Monitor, and look forward to reading Spring Fever and his other works.
Posted at 03:55 PM in Commentary, Gaza/West Bank, Israel, Middle East, Terrorism, U.S. State Dept., USAID, White House | Permalink | Comments (0)
Technorati Tags: Andrew C. McCarthy, business, government, politics
| Reblog (0)